<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Clarke Made Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection in 1999</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Iraq War Lies</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-202301</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-202301</guid>
					<description>[...] Here&#8217;s the report, read it for yourself. (Of course, if you&#8217;ve been paying attention, you know that even the Clinton administration tied Saddam &#38; Iraq to bin Laden and al-Qaida on multiple occasions in the 1990s and often even warned us of the threat Iraq posed) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s the report, read it for yourself. (Of course, if you&#8217;ve been paying attention, you know that even the Clinton administration tied Saddam &#38; Iraq to bin Laden and al-Qaida on multiple occasions in the 1990s and often even warned us of the threat Iraq posed) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; You&#8217;ll Never Guess Who&#8217;s Behind the Latest Bush-Bashing Report</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-151520</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-151520</guid>
					<description>[...] They&#8217;re essentially basing their propaganda on hindsight. Just ignore the fact that many were saying the same things about Iraq&#8230; before George W. Bush moved to Washington. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] They&#8217;re essentially basing their propaganda on hindsight. Just ignore the fact that many were saying the same things about Iraq&#8230; before George W. Bush moved to Washington. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Clark claims Bin Laden/Iraq link : [H] Hegemonic Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-64361</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-64361</guid>
					<description>[...] Given the evidence presented to the White House before the airstrike, Clarke said, the president “would have been derelict in his duties if he didn’t blow up the facility.”   ~Washington Post via Texasrainmaker.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Given the evidence presented to the White House before the airstrike, Clarke said, the president “would have been derelict in his duties if he didn’t blow up the facility.”   ~Washington Post via Texasrainmaker.com [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; The &#8220;Iraq is a Distraction&#8221; Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-64284</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-64284</guid>
					<description>[...] Or maybe their source was Richard Clarke, Clinton&#8217;s National Coordinator of Counterterrorism and Computer Security Programs, who said this in 1999: Clarke did provide new information in defense of Clinton’s decision to fire Tomahawk cruise missiles at the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for bin Laden’s role in the Aug. 7 embassy bombings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Or maybe their source was Richard Clarke, Clinton&#8217;s National Coordinator of Counterterrorism and Computer Security Programs, who said this in 1999: Clarke did provide new information in defense of Clinton’s decision to fire Tomahawk cruise missiles at the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for bin Laden’s role in the Aug. 7 embassy bombings. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Is Darfur an Imminent Threat?</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-62315</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-62315</guid>
					<description>[...] He would commit troops immediately to an oil-rich, predominantly Muslim country, with suspected ties to al-Qaida and WMDs, that’s experiencing genocide? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] He would commit troops immediately to an oil-rich, predominantly Muslim country, with suspected ties to al-Qaida and WMDs, that’s experiencing genocide? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Bill Clinton Justifies Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-12712</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-12712</guid>
					<description>[...] Bill Clinton spent a lot of time in the interview with Chris Wallace touting Richard Clarke as the terrorism guru. If we&#8217;re to take Richard Clarke at his word, then we should probably also believe him when he made the Iraq/al-Qaida connection, in defense of Bill Clinton&#8217;s bombing of the pharamceutical plant in Khartoum: Clarke did provide new information in defense of Clinton’s decision to fire Tomahawk cruise missiles at the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for bin Laden’s role in the Aug. 7 embassy bombings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bill Clinton spent a lot of time in the interview with Chris Wallace touting Richard Clarke as the terrorism guru. If we&#8217;re to take Richard Clarke at his word, then we should probably also believe him when he made the Iraq/al-Qaida connection, in defense of Bill Clinton&#8217;s bombing of the pharamceutical plant in Khartoum: Clarke did provide new information in defense of Clinton’s decision to fire Tomahawk cruise missiles at the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for bin Laden’s role in the Aug. 7 embassy bombings. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Path to 9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-12316</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-12316</guid>
					<description>[...] &#8230;and speaking of Richard Clarke (who by the way made the Iraq/al-Qaida connection back in 1998), here he is debunking the Democrats&#8217; talking points regarding the Bush administration&#8217;s committment to fighting terrorism pre-9/11: QUESTION: What is your response to the suggestion in the [Aug. 12, 2002] Time [magazine] article that the Bush administration was unwilling to take on board the suggestions made in the Clinton administration because of animus against the — general animus against the foreign policy? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8230;and speaking of Richard Clarke (who by the way made the Iraq/al-Qaida connection back in 1998), here he is debunking the Democrats&#8217; talking points regarding the Bush administration&#8217;s committment to fighting terrorism pre-9/11: QUESTION: What is your response to the suggestion in the [Aug. 12, 2002] Time [magazine] article that the Bush administration was unwilling to take on board the suggestions made in the Clinton administration because of animus against the — general animus against the foreign policy? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Iraq &#38; Saddam ARE Part of the War on Terror</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-6180</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-6180</guid>
					<description>[...] Do they conveniently forget (or just ignore) the fact that Richard Clarke (Archived Full WaPo article from January 23, 1999: Page 1 &#124; 2 &#124; 3) said: While U.S. intelligence officials disclosed shortly after the missile attack that they had obtained a soil sample from the El Shifa site that contained a precursor of VX nerve gas, Clarke said that the U.S. government is “sure” that Iraqi nerve gas experts actually produced a powdered VX-like substance at the plant that, when mixed with bleach and water, would have become fully active VX nerve gas. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Do they conveniently forget (or just ignore) the fact that Richard Clarke (Archived Full WaPo article from January 23, 1999: Page 1 | 2 | 3) said: While U.S. intelligence officials disclosed shortly after the missile attack that they had obtained a soil sample from the El Shifa site that contained a precursor of VX nerve gas, Clarke said that the U.S. government is “sure” that Iraqi nerve gas experts actually produced a powdered VX-like substance at the plant that, when mixed with bleach and water, would have become fully active VX nerve gas. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Are They Really Anti-War or Just Anti-Bush?</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-1026</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2004/03/24/108014941866383557/#comment-1026</guid>
					<description>[...] So now they want to send troops into an oil-rich, predominantly Muslim country, with suspected ties to al-Qaida and WMDs, that&#8217;s experiencing genocide? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So now they want to send troops into an oil-rich, predominantly Muslim country, with suspected ties to al-Qaida and WMDs, that&#8217;s experiencing genocide? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
