The race pimps have taken political correctness to new heights in attempting to redefine any and every word known to mankind as a “racial slur” when it suits their agenda. Remember
this story?
Now Michael Bloomberg is the latest target of this idiocy.
The civil rights attorney (Norman Siegel) noted that more than 70 percent of the Transport Workers Union’s 33,000 members are “of color.” And while he didn’t believe Bloomberg’s use of the word was in itself racist, Siegel said, “The perception out there is that it is racist. And the reaction has enormous racial overtones.”
Who is creating this perception, if Bloomberg’s use of a word wasn’t racist? Perhaps it’s the accuser, himself.
And what did Bloomberg say that was so offensive?
The mayor complained that union leaders had “thuggishly turned their backs on New York City and disgraced the noble concept of public service.”
So the racist attorney who brought up the issue, while simultaneously stating that he didn’t think Bloomberg’s use of the word in question was racist, was in fact the catalyst for the non-story becoming a story. In fact, since Siegel says Bloomberg was not using the word in a racial sense, the fact that “thuggishly” is being “perceived” as being racist by Seigel and his cohorts-in-race-pimpery suggests that it is Siegel who makes the comparisons of “thug = minority”.
So why did Seigel manufacture this controversy out of thin air?
Siegel challenged the mayor to use the dispute over the one word as a “springboard” to focus attention on racial issues in the city…
There you have it. Another race-pimp-with-an-agenda injects race into a non-racial story simply to be a “springboard” to focus attention on race. It should be clear who the real racist of this story is.