Texas Rainmaker
Redefining What Constitutes a Racial Slur
December 27th, 2005 12:56 pm
The race pimps have taken political correctness to new heights in attempting to redefine any and every word known to mankind as a “racial slur” when it suits their agenda. Remember this story?

Now Michael Bloomberg is the latest target of this idiocy.

The civil rights attorney (Norman Siegel) noted that more than 70 percent of the Transport Workers Union’s 33,000 members are “of color.” And while he didn’t believe Bloomberg’s use of the word was in itself racist, Siegel said, “The perception out there is that it is racist. And the reaction has enormous racial overtones.”

Who is creating this perception, if Bloomberg’s use of a word wasn’t racist? Perhaps it’s the accuser, himself.

And what did Bloomberg say that was so offensive?

The mayor complained that union leaders had “thuggishly turned their backs on New York City and disgraced the noble concept of public service.”

So the racist attorney who brought up the issue, while simultaneously stating that he didn’t think Bloomberg’s use of the word in question was racist, was in fact the catalyst for the non-story becoming a story. In fact, since Siegel says Bloomberg was not using the word in a racial sense, the fact that “thuggishly” is being “perceived” as being racist by Seigel and his cohorts-in-race-pimpery suggests that it is Siegel who makes the comparisons of “thug = minority”.

So why did Seigel manufacture this controversy out of thin air?

Siegel challenged the mayor to use the dispute over the one word as a “springboard” to focus attention on racial issues in the city…

There you have it. Another race-pimp-with-an-agenda injects race into a non-racial story simply to be a “springboard” to focus attention on race. It should be clear who the real racist of this story is.
Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
Either They Is or They Isn’t…
December 27th, 2005 10:38 am

In a followup to a previous article, the Houston Comical now says Mayor Bill White is asking FEMA to foot the bill for the security needed to investigate the increasing crime in “many of the problem areas [that] fall in southwest Houston, particularly in apartment complexes housing numerous Katrina evacuees“, while simultaneously “not identif[ing] a cause for the rise in crime”, while simultaneously pointing “to increased gang activity and the growth in population from Katrina evacuees“, while simultaneously saying the “uptick in crime is not solely attributable to Hurricane Katrina evacuees.”

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
Merry Christmas
December 23rd, 2005 9:30 pm

He’s what it’s all about.
Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
The Value of MSM
December 23rd, 2005 12:57 pm
Chasing down all the “scoops” and endlessly keeping non-stories alive hasn’t proven a successful recipe for MSM this past year. Perhaps it’s because the agenda-driven MSM still doesn’t understand that competitive news sources and resources that are now more easily-accessed by the general public shine a bright light on MSM’s liberal bent.
See what happened to the New York Times this year (hat tip: Michelle):

..and Gannett (publisher of USA Today):

…and Dow Jones & Co. (publisher of the Wall Street Journal):

…and the Tribune Company (Publishers of Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times):

Looks like trust in the MSM wasn’t the only thing that tanked over the last couple of years. They thought they could “get” George W. Bush and the Republicans by pumping life into dead non-stories and publishing classified information while simultaneously ignoring real stories

I would subscribe to the MSM papers… but I find Charmin is much softer.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (4) Comments
divider
In another stunning example of just how detached the Hollywood elite are from mainstream America, they’ve started releasing movies showing “a new side of terrorism.” The useless idiots that make up the Hollywood elite really do think terrorists are “just misunderstood”. How else do you explain their portrayal of murderous thugs, who want to behead each and every one of us while we’re still breathing, or think of killing the President of the U.S. as the “holy grail of jihad“, as “ordinary people”?

Syriana, the George Clooney political drama that opened Nov. 23, paints a sympathetic portrait of a young man recruited into a radical Islamic group planning an attack on a U.S. oil firm.

“I’ve been called a traitor for questioning the war,” [Clooney] says. “But more people are beginning to look critically at what our government is doing, who we’re fighting. And that’s the most patriotic thing you can do.”

No, it’s not patriotic to glorify terrorists. And doing so has nothing to do with criticizing the war. I don’t consider you a traitor for questioning the war… I consider you a traitor for showing sympathy to terrorists planning attacks on the U.S.
Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider

Maybe it only seems bad because of the author’s name.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
It’s that time of year again. Everyone’s coming up with their lists of things to remember from 2005. Including MSM. Here is their list:
  1. Hurricane Katrina - Bush blamed for slow response that led to lots of murder and mayhem among poor minorities in New Orleans. Nevermind the fact that most of the rumors of mischief were false and forget that the local and state governments completely fell down on the job or that environmentalists had fought the levee system. Nope, it was all Bush’s fault. Oh yeah, and the race issue was moot as well. But what the hell, “Bush doesn’t like black people” has a sentimental ring to it, don’t ya think? Here’s what I think.
  2. Papal Transition - A story that had nothing to do with Bush still couldn’t escape the liberals’ ‘blame Bush‘ beat.
  3. Iraq - The real story here is that a former dictatorship is quickly evolving into a free democracy, but MSM would rather focus on a liberal lunatic and her nutty protests. The MSM continues to press forward with the idea that Bush lied, while simultaneously ignoring that the very same “lies” were presented repeatedly by liberals in previous years.
  4. Supreme Court - Bush gets to pick two SCOTUS nominees. Liberals think the end times are near! Bush could nominated Mother Teresa and Ghandi and liberals would still oppose them as being advocates of “rolling back civil rights”.
  5. London Bombings - While many turned their thoughts to the victims and their families, many liberals were immediately able to assign blame to Bush.
  6. Asian Quake - Finally a natural disaster not blamed on Bush. Maybe they just forgot.
  7. Terri Schiavo - Bush and his evil vast right wing coalition tried to invade this poor woman’s life and impose their religious beliefs upon her. Nevermind the fact that her desires were not clearly determined when a judge ordered her starved to death. But never fear, at least the emaciated, thirsty corpse will give Democrats some campaign material.
  8. CIA Leak - Ah, finally the Valerie Plame non-story makes the top 10. Nevermind that nobody was charged with an illegal leak or the fact that Plame’s status as ‘covert’ is still in question. Nope, this was certainly a top 10 story because… well… MSM says so.
  9. Bush’s Struggles - WTF? The things the AP lists in this ridiculous category comprise all the retarded accusations tossed at Bush for the items listed 1 through 9. Are you telling me (a) that the AP couldn’t come up with one more item to round out the top 10 that they had to resort to a “Bush is just bad in general” category or (b) that the AP didn’t blast Bush enough in items 1 through 9 that they had to throw in one more parting shot before concluding the list. Beautiful.

Now, here’s my list of Top News Items that MSM Would Rather Ignore:

  1. Sandy Berger - Former National Security Advisor, Sandy Berger, pleads guilty to stealing and destroying classified documents relating to the government’s response to terrorism.
  2. Saddam Hussein - Goes on trial.
  3. Iraq - 70% voter turnout in the new Iraqi democracy.
  4. Economic Growth - Almost 4.5 million new jobs since recovery began in mid-2003.
  5. Bush - Sworn-in to second term.
  6. Libya - Scraps its WMD programs.
  7. Afghanistan - Sees 50% turnout for parliamentary elections.
  8. No Child Left Behind - A success.
  9. Terrorism - In the Middle East, support for terrorism and terrorists is down, support for democracy is up.
  10. Democrat Struggles - Including seeing Dems switch parties and losing the fundraising race.
Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
The only thing that suprises me about this article in the Houston Chronicle Comical is that they didn’t find a way to tie this story to Tom Delay.

especially those swelled with an influx of Katrina evacuees.

and…

=Most of the spike has come since mid-November…

and…

Fifty-one homicides were reported in November and December - a 70 percent increase from the same period last year, Hurtt said.

and…

“You’re bringing people with different cultures, different backgrounds; they have different lifestyles there in New Orleans than we have in Houston,” said Capt. Dale Brown of the homicide division. “The equilibrium was thrown out of whack, with people competing for jobs, competing for turf, or whatever it is.”

and…

Hurtt said that after talking with state and regional officials, he is “pretty certain that (Louisiana) gang members did relocate here to Houston.”

BUT… despite all of this the story still focuses on the problem being related to homegrown citizens, the holidays and local gangs. Why are they trying so hard to not blame those from New Orleans when the evidence seems to be pointing in that direction? Why does the whole article repeat factors pointing towards imported crime, but then the authors work so hard to distance themselves from the logical conclusion? Does it have to do with the race of the majority of the evacuees? The socioeconic status? Political correctness? If the rise in crime is not related to the evacuees, why include references to such in the article at all?
Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
Because It’s Bush
December 21st, 2005 12:59 pm
…is the only reason the warrantless spying non-story is a “scandal“. Think I’m wrong?

Where were the calls for investigations when Bill Clinton was authorizing warrantless spying?

Where were they when Jimmy Carter was authorizing warrantless spying?

Liberals again proving they have one standard for their own and another standard for everyone else.

Update: Heck, Clinton even “expanded the use of warrantless searches to entirely domestic situations with no foreign intelligence value whatsoever.” Have you heard a peep about that until now?

Update 2: Oh, and about that judge that stepped down today who will certainly be granted sainthood by the DNC, seems he was just another liberal activist Clinton appointee anyway. More non-story to pile on the existing non-story.

Update 3: It is interesting that all those folks who rejoiced in the Plame “scandal” are so silent about this story in which a classified program designed to track terrorists was leaked, in detail, to the press. A program which most in the legal community are saying is completely within the government’s legal authority to conduct.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (0) Comments
divider
Remember when CBSNews reported that, “…Hurricane Katrina has become a generation-defining catastrophe - a disaster with a predominantly black toll, tinged with racism.” The race peddlers were so quick to jump on this story. They even likened Katrina’s aftermath to the Holocaust.

Black survivors of Hurricane Katrina said Tuesday that racism contributed to the slow disaster response, at times likening themselves in emotional congressional testimony to victims of genocide and the Holocaust.

But a new report suggests what we all knew to be the truth… this disaster was not about race or racism.

Of the 380 bodies from New Orleans that have been formally identified, a disproportionate number are white. New Orleans’ population was 28 percent white, yet 33 percent of the identified victims in the city are white.

And it wasn’t about socioeconomic status, either.
The bodies of New Orleans residents killed by Hurricane Katrina were almost as likely to be recovered from middle-class neighborhoods as from the city’s poorer districts, such as the Lower 9th Ward, according to a Los Angeles Times analysis of data released by the state of Louisiana.

Of the 528 bodies recovered from identifiable addresses in city neighborhoods, 230 came from areas that had household incomes above the citywide median of $27,133. The poorer areas accounted for 298 bodies.

Reminds me of another race/class myth the Left has been perpetuating ad nauseum directly contrary to the facts. That our military is made up mostly of poor minorities who’ve been duped into serving. In fact, the military makeup is pretty even across the board.

Another day, more liberal lies to laugh at.
Posted by TexasRainmaker | (1) Comment
divider

Texas Rainmaker is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
Graphics by: Margolis Media Works | Style by: Lisa Sabin - E.Webscapes

Copyright © 2003-2006






The 2007 Weblog Awards