Pat at Brainster does a good job deconstructing the sloppy work in Paul Krugman’s January 30th New York Times article in passing along incorrect information about the Abramoff story. The thing that jumps out at me first in his post is that MSM is either unwilling or unable to fully analyze stories these days. I tend to think there’s a little of both, especially the former, when it deals with a Republican.
Why is Pat’s analysis, and others like it, important? Here’s one very big reason.
