Democrats will go into mourning today when they hear the news that Karl Rove will not be charged with any crimes in the made up case involving liar Joe Wilson’s wife.

And how much time has been focused on Rove’s non-case versus an actual scandal involving a Congressman who was videotaped… videotaped… taking bribes? Maybe the amount of ink required to print a “D” is more costly to print then an “R” and thus it’s just a business decision as to which stories they’ll cover.

But never fear, Democrats, you’ve got the MSM on your side to ease the pain. Instead of reporting the fact that Rove won’t be charged because he’s not guilty of anything, NBC has taken it upon themselves to cleverly word their story to make you think the guilty SOB got away with something…

“Karl Rove Avoids Indictment In CIA Leak Case“:

Prosecutors have decided not to charge Karl Rove with any crimes in the CIA leak investigation.

He avoids? They’ve decided? This is MSM’s way of telling their liberal allies that they believe he’s guilty as hell and that the prosecutor had enough to indict and prosecute, but he just simply “chose” not to and thus Rove “avoided” something that should’ve been a sure thing.

They just can’t let their fabricated scandals die of natural causes, can they? No matter how many of their bogus stories flatline, they plug them up to life support and keep ‘em going until the body decomposes into oblivion… then they simply generate a new scandal.

Get ready, I’m sure there’s already one in the works…

By the way, where are the truthout guys on this one? Talk about embarrassing moments. They ran a bogus story a month ago announcing Rove had been indicted. Maybe they should change their name to CredibilityOut. Contact Jason Leopold and thank him for the laughs.

The kids over at DimwitUnderground are as sad about this story as they were about the news of Zarqawi’s death. What a bad week for the Left… and a great week for America. See the correlation?

Update: al-Reuters runs it’s “Rove Exit” photo. What media bias?

Update 2: So what do you do when your political attack strategy falls flat on its face? Find some hired pit bulls to publish a press release threatening an innocent man with “possible future civil litigation”.

WASHINGTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–June 13, 2006–The following is a statement by Christopher Wolf, Proskauer Rose LLP, Counsel for Ambassador Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame Wilson

We have become aware of the communication between Mr. Fitzgerald and Mr. Luskin concerning Karl Rove’s status in the criminal investigation. We have no first-hand knowledge of the reason for the communication or what further developments in the criminal investigation it may signal. While it appears that Mr. Rove will not be called to answer in criminal court for his participation in the wrongful disclosure of Valerie Wilson’s classified employment status at the CIA in retaliation against Joe Wilson for questioning the rationale for war in Iraq, that obviously does not end the matter. The day still may come when Mr. Rove and others are called to account in a court of law for their attacks on the Wilsons.

Contact:
Proskauer Rose LLP
Christopher Wolf, Partner
202-416-6818
cwolf@proskauer.com

Their strategy is to just keep the endless speculation alive in the MSM simply for the smear points. They just lost in the court of public opinion and this is their way of demanding a retrial. The public already distrusts the politicians across the board… adding lawyers to that mix is a priceless strategy of enormous stupidity. Keep up the great work!

1. Rove Won’t Be Charged in C.I.A. Leak Case

   Just wanted to post this news real quick: NY Times:
   The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year crimina…

   Trackback by Stop The ACLU — 6:16 am
   

2. Rove won’t be indicted

   Via the NYT:
   WASHINGTON, June 13 — The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year criminal investigation t…

   Trackback by Sister Toldjah — 6:53 am
   

3. […] And now, the coup de grâce: Democrats will go into mourning today when they hear the news that Karl Rove will not be charged with any crimes in the made up case involving liar Joe Wilson’s wife. […]

   Pingback by UrbanGrounds » Blog Archive » Rove Will Not Be Charged — 8:32 am
   

4. Karl Rove Cleared, Leopold Weeps

   From CNN:WASHINGTON (CNN) — White House senior adviser Karl Rove has been told by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald that he will not be charged in the CIA leak case, according to Robert Luskin, Rove’s lawyer. In deference to the pending

   Trackback by The Sandbox — 10:14 am
   

5. […] Gosh, after a week that saw the formation of a new Iraqi coalition government, the killing of a terror leader, the death of the Rove non-case and Hillary Clinton booed by her own liberal base, this almost feels like I’m just piling on… […]

   Pingback by Texas Rainmaker » Life on the Left… — 8:09 pm
   

6. Or maybe Rove was investigated because the leak seemed to have come from his office, and it would be reasonable to figure out if he was connected to it?

   And yes, they “decided” not to indict him. That’s what happens when there are options available and someone chooses one: they “decide.” I’m sure you’ve heard that word before?

   And it would be incorrect to report that Rove didn’t commit a crime, because none of us actually know the truth there. We know that there isn’t an indictment. Beyond that, I don’t know the truth, and neither do you.

   Comment by John — 10:46 pm
   

7. “And yes, they “decided” not to indict him. That’s what happens when there are options available and someone chooses one: they “decide.” I’m sure you’ve heard that word before?”

   Actually, when there is no evidence of a crime, it would be prosecutorial misconduct to indict. That’s like saying the cops had a “choice” to shoot you for jaywalking. In a highly theoretical world, I guess you could say there’s a choice, but in reality, it’s not really a choice at all.

   “And it would be incorrect to report that Rove didn’t commit a crime, because none of us actually know the truth there. We know that there isn’t an indictment. Beyond that, I don’t know the truth, and neither do you.”

   Oh, I forgot the presumption of innocence only applies to Democrats. Forgive me.

   But thanks for bolstering my statement on the media bias. If nobody (including them) knows the truth, then they’re just reporting speculation. I guess, like the presumption of innocence, objective reporting doesn’t apply to Republicans either, huh?

   Comment by Texas Rainmaker — 5:30 am
   

8. Speaking of fabricated scandals, we could talk about Whitewater. Or we could talk real scandals, like Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, Plamegate, What WMDS?, the Downing Street memos, Dick’s Energy Commission, NSA wiretaps, the missing 12 billion cash in Iraq…. Yep, the list goes on and on.

   Comment by Juan Gonzales — 7:36 am
   

9. “Juan” you apparently don’t get the irony. It’s not the Republicans running a campaign against a “Democrat culture of corruption”. If it were, your point would have some merit. No, the irony is the self-righteous indignation of the Democrat party acting high and mighty, pointing out everyone else’s sins, but ignoring their own.

   Maybe irony is not the right word… how does hypocrisy sound?

   Comment by Texas Rainmaker — 8:24 am
   

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

You must be logged in to post a comment.