<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Liberal Fairy Tale Dies of Natural Causes</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5780</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5780</guid>
					<description>"Juan" you apparently don't get the irony.  It's not the Republicans running a campaign against a "Democrat culture of corruption".  If it were, your point would have some merit.  No, the irony is the self-righteous indignation of the Democrat party acting high and mighty, pointing out everyone else's sins, but ignoring their own.

Maybe irony is not the right word... how does hypocrisy sound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Juan&#8221; you apparently don&#8217;t get the irony.  It&#8217;s not the Republicans running a campaign against a &#8220;Democrat culture of corruption&#8221;.  If it were, your point would have some merit.  No, the irony is the self-righteous indignation of the Democrat party acting high and mighty, pointing out everyone else&#8217;s sins, but ignoring their own.</p>
<p>Maybe irony is not the right word&#8230; how does hypocrisy sound?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Juan Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5749</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5749</guid>
					<description>Speaking of fabricated scandals, we could talk about Whitewater.  Or we could talk real scandals, like Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, Plamegate, What WMDS?, the Downing Street memos, Dick's Energy Commission, NSA wiretaps, the missing 12 billion cash in Iraq....   Yep, the list goes on and on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of fabricated scandals, we could talk about Whitewater.  Or we could talk real scandals, like Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, Plamegate, What WMDS?, the Downing Street memos, Dick&#8217;s Energy Commission, NSA wiretaps, the missing 12 billion cash in Iraq&#8230;.   Yep, the list goes on and on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5725</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5725</guid>
					<description>"&lt;i&gt;And yes, they “decided” not to indict him. That’s what happens when there are options available and someone chooses one: they “decide.” I’m sure you’ve heard that word before?&lt;/i&gt;"

Actually, when there is no evidence of a crime, it would be prosecutorial misconduct to indict.  That's like saying the cops had a "choice" to shoot you for jaywalking.  In a highly theoretical world, I guess you could say there's a choice, but in reality, it's not really a choice at all.

"&lt;i&gt;And it would be incorrect to report that Rove didn’t commit a crime, because none of us actually know the truth there. We know that there isn’t an indictment. Beyond that, I don’t know the truth, and neither do you.&lt;/i&gt;"

Oh, I forgot the presumption of innocence only applies to Democrats.  Forgive me.

But thanks for bolstering my statement on the media bias.  If nobody (including them) knows the truth, then they're just reporting speculation.  I guess, like the presumption of innocence, objective reporting doesn't apply to Republicans either, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>And yes, they “decided” not to indict him. That’s what happens when there are options available and someone chooses one: they “decide.” I’m sure you’ve heard that word before?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, when there is no evidence of a crime, it would be prosecutorial misconduct to indict.  That&#8217;s like saying the cops had a &#8220;choice&#8221; to shoot you for jaywalking.  In a highly theoretical world, I guess you could say there&#8217;s a choice, but in reality, it&#8217;s not really a choice at all.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>And it would be incorrect to report that Rove didn’t commit a crime, because none of us actually know the truth there. We know that there isn’t an indictment. Beyond that, I don’t know the truth, and neither do you.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, I forgot the presumption of innocence only applies to Democrats.  Forgive me.</p>
<p>But thanks for bolstering my statement on the media bias.  If nobody (including them) knows the truth, then they&#8217;re just reporting speculation.  I guess, like the presumption of innocence, objective reporting doesn&#8217;t apply to Republicans either, huh?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5655</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5655</guid>
					<description>Or maybe Rove was investigated because the leak seemed to have come from his office, and it would be reasonable to figure out if he was connected to it? 

And yes, they "decided" not to indict him. That's what happens when there are options available and someone chooses one: they "decide." I'm sure you've heard that word before? 

And it would be incorrect to report that Rove didn't commit a crime, because none of us actually know the truth there. We know that there isn't an indictment. Beyond that, I don't know the truth, and neither do you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe Rove was investigated because the leak seemed to have come from his office, and it would be reasonable to figure out if he was connected to it? </p>
<p>And yes, they &#8220;decided&#8221; not to indict him. That&#8217;s what happens when there are options available and someone chooses one: they &#8220;decide.&#8221; I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard that word before? </p>
<p>And it would be incorrect to report that Rove didn&#8217;t commit a crime, because none of us actually know the truth there. We know that there isn&#8217;t an indictment. Beyond that, I don&#8217;t know the truth, and neither do you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Life on the Left&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5615</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 02:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5615</guid>
					<description>[...] Gosh, after a week that saw the formation of a new Iraqi coalition government, the killing of a terror leader, the death of the Rove non-case and Hillary Clinton booed by her own liberal base, this almost feels like I&#8217;m just piling on&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gosh, after a week that saw the formation of a new Iraqi coalition government, the killing of a terror leader, the death of the Rove non-case and Hillary Clinton booed by her own liberal base, this almost feels like I&#8217;m just piling on&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Sandbox</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5553</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5553</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Karl Rove Cleared, Leopold Weeps&lt;/strong&gt;

From CNN:WASHINGTON (CNN) -- White House senior adviser Karl Rove has been told by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald that he will not be charged in the CIA leak case, according to Robert Luskin, Rove's lawyer. In deference to the pending</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Karl Rove Cleared, Leopold Weeps</strong></p>
<p>From CNN:WASHINGTON (CNN) &#8212; White House senior adviser Karl Rove has been told by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald that he will not be charged in the CIA leak case, according to Robert Luskin, Rove&#8217;s lawyer. In deference to the pending
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: UrbanGrounds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rove Will Not Be Charged</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5543</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5543</guid>
					<description>[...] And now, the coup de grâce: Democrats will go into mourning today when they hear the news that Karl Rove will not be charged with any crimes in the made up case involving liar Joe Wilson’s wife. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And now, the coup de grâce: Democrats will go into mourning today when they hear the news that Karl Rove will not be charged with any crimes in the made up case involving liar Joe Wilson’s wife. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5536</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5536</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rove won&#8217;t be indicted&lt;/strong&gt;

Via the NYT:
WASHINGTON, June 13 — The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year criminal investigation t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rove won&#8217;t be indicted</strong></p>
<p>Via the NYT:<br />
WASHINGTON, June 13 — The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year criminal investigation t&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stop The ACLU</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5531</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/13/another-liberal-fairy-tale-dies-of-natural-causes/#comment-5531</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rove Won&#8217;t Be Charged in C.I.A. Leak Case&lt;/strong&gt;

	Just wanted to post this news real quick: NY Times:
	The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year crimina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rove Won&#8217;t Be Charged in C.I.A. Leak Case</strong></p>
<p>	Just wanted to post this news real quick: NY Times:<br />
	The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year crimina&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
