By “bad” do you mean unprecedented economic growth?

Or by “bad” do you mean the creation of 4.7 million jobs?

Or by “bad” do you mean 17 consecutive quarters of economic expansion?

Or by “bad” do you mean rising disposable income, lower unemployment, increased consumer spending, and higher starting salaries for college graduates?

Or by “bad” do you mean the capture and trial of Saddam Hussein?

Or by “bad” do you mean Afghanistan holding its first-ever modern democratic election, or Iraq holding a true democratic election for the first time in 30 years, or Palestinians freely electing a leader, or the resignation of Lebanon’s pro-Syrian government, or Libya scrapping its WMD programs, or Egypt holding its first-ever multiparty presidential elections?

Yeah, that’s what I thought you meant.

…and I’m loving it!…

1. Taken bribes
2. Recieved DUIs
3. Been convicted of tax evasion

Besides, it doesn’t matter if they form a new government in Iraq. The horrible government there is not the cause of the trouble there, it’s the effect.

By changing the effect you are not solving the problem.

If you establish democracy in Iraq without reeducating them thoroughly, they will just get rid of it and elect another dictator.