<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN:  Is Beheading Innocent Civilians Really All That Bad?</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Liberalism in 25 Words</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-6436</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-6436</guid>
					<description>[...] Terrorists are freedom fighters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Terrorists are freedom fighters. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don Surber</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5869</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5869</guid>
					<description>I gave up reading after the numerous errors on Al-Qaeda. F"founded in the 1980s" -- try 1990s. "1993 WTC bombing" -- nope, that was Iraq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up reading after the numerous errors on Al-Qaeda. F&#8221;founded in the 1980s&#8221; &#8212; try 1990s. &#8220;1993 WTC bombing&#8221; &#8212; nope, that was Iraq
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: C.S. Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5865</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5865</guid>
					<description>Octavis Nasr is clueless, I'm amazed she is the Senior Editor for Arab affairs at CNN. Here is her take on the killing of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

Newsbusters reports on a CNN report this morning where Octavia Nasr, the senior CNN editor for Arab Affairs, attempts to downplay the capture of Zarqawi and states "there are many small insurgency groups in Iraq that are more powerful than Al Qaeda, the Zarqawi group...But definitely the experts tell us that this is not a lone group in Iraq. There are many thousands more like it." 

This statement is simply ludicrious, particularly coming from the editor of Arab affairs. There actually are not "thousands more" groups like al Qaeda in Iraq and proclaiming there are many smaller insurgent groups more powerful than al Qaeda does not coincide with reality.

http://www.securitywatchtower.com/archives/003442major_blow_to_al_qaeda_abu_musab_alzarqawi_killed.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Octavis Nasr is clueless, I&#8217;m amazed she is the Senior Editor for Arab affairs at CNN. Here is her take on the killing of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.</p>
<p>Newsbusters reports on a CNN report this morning where Octavia Nasr, the senior CNN editor for Arab Affairs, attempts to downplay the capture of Zarqawi and states &#8220;there are many small insurgency groups in Iraq that are more powerful than Al Qaeda, the Zarqawi group&#8230;But definitely the experts tell us that this is not a lone group in Iraq. There are many thousands more like it.&#8221; </p>
<p>This statement is simply ludicrious, particularly coming from the editor of Arab affairs. There actually are not &#8220;thousands more&#8221; groups like al Qaeda in Iraq and proclaiming there are many smaller insurgent groups more powerful than al Qaeda does not coincide with reality.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitywatchtower.com/archives/003442major_blow_to_al_qaeda_abu_musab_alzarqawi_killed.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.securitywatchtower.com/archives/003442major_blow_to_al_qaeda_abu_musab_alzarqawi_killed.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: newFan</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5862</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5862</guid>
					<description>I think we all know which side CNN and the rest of the msm is on.... Thank God for sites like this, Rush, Hannity, WND,
Newsmax, etc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all know which side CNN and the rest of the msm is on&#8230;. Thank God for sites like this, Rush, Hannity, WND,<br />
Newsmax, etc&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5859</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5859</guid>
					<description>Rhetorical or direct, I'd like to hear the bastards answer that question.  

Not that anyone on the left can address a simple yes or no question directly...

Sean is always asking direct yes or no questions of members of the left, I have yet to hear even one respond with a direct answer, have you? 

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhetorical or direct, I&#8217;d like to hear the bastards answer that question.  </p>
<p>Not that anyone on the left can address a simple yes or no question directly&#8230;</p>
<p>Sean is always asking direct yes or no questions of members of the left, I have yet to hear even one respond with a direct answer, have you? </p>
<p>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Old Soldier</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5858</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/06/14/cnn-is-beheading-innocent-civilians-really-all-that-bad/#comment-5858</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;"This begs the question, CNN…. which side are you on?"&lt;/i&gt;

Jason, that is a &lt;b&gt;rhetorical&lt;/b&gt; question, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;This begs the question, CNN…. which side are you on?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Jason, that is a <b>rhetorical</b> question, right?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
