<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nutroots Brace for Another Loss</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Lawyer in Lamont offering legal service to those suffering from mesothelioma cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-241255</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-241255</guid>
					<description>[...] Texas Rainmaker " The Nutroots Brace for Another Loss [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Texas Rainmaker &#8221; The Nutroots Brace for Another Loss [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doiw</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10494</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10494</guid>
					<description>Republicans have term limits.  Democrats don't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans have term limits.  Democrats don&#8217;t.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10457</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10457</guid>
					<description>From what I understand, the GOP candidate in CT is scandal-plagued.  Lieberman is the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, the GOP candidate in CT is scandal-plagued.  Lieberman is the way to go.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: UrbanGrounds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lamont Beats Three-Term Incumbent Joe Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10437</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10437</guid>
					<description>[...] h/t to Texas Rainmaker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] h/t to Texas Rainmaker [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10361</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10361</guid>
					<description>Isn't going to happen.  Republicans are already talking about supporting Lieberman, leaving the poor shmuck who won the Republican primary hanging out to dry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t going to happen.  Republicans are already talking about supporting Lieberman, leaving the poor shmuck who won the Republican primary hanging out to dry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Conservative Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10303</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10303</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;It Ain't Lookin' Good...&lt;/strong&gt;

...for "Joementum," that is. Here are the early results as of 9:44 pm EDT, via The Drudge Report: Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary 423 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 56.55% Lamont, Ned 79,580 52.17% Lieberman, Joe (i)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It Ain&#8217;t Lookin&#8217; Good&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;for &#8220;Joementum,&#8221; that is. Here are the early results as of 9:44 pm EDT, via The Drudge Report: Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary 423 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 56.55% Lamont, Ned 79,580 52.17% Lieberman, Joe (i)&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10298</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10298</guid>
					<description>Hacked?  Hardly.

The server Lieberman's campaign site is running off of is shared with plenty others, and their sites are all functioning properly. 

Additionally, the mail server on the same domain (joe2006.com) is functioning properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hacked?  Hardly.</p>
<p>The server Lieberman&#8217;s campaign site is running off of is shared with plenty others, and their sites are all functioning properly. </p>
<p>Additionally, the mail server on the same domain (joe2006.com) is functioning properly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Gentle Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10297</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10297</guid>
					<description>Lieberman is not my favorite politician, but he is one of my favorite Democrats.  I would vote for him over many republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman is not my favorite politician, but he is one of my favorite Democrats.  I would vote for him over many republicans.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: NovaNardis</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10295</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10295</guid>
					<description>Kos is taking the spotlight off himself and giving it to the people who really deserve it, the campaign workers.  Compared to doing donor research, canvassing neighborhoods, and all the other nitty gritty that goes on with campaigns, what Kos did was relatively easy.

You are blowing this out of proportion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kos is taking the spotlight off himself and giving it to the people who really deserve it, the campaign workers.  Compared to doing donor research, canvassing neighborhoods, and all the other nitty gritty that goes on with campaigns, what Kos did was relatively easy.</p>
<p>You are blowing this out of proportion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GOP Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10248</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/08/08/the-nutroots-brace-for-another-loss/#comment-10248</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eyes On Connecticut&lt;/strong&gt;

I eagerly await the results of today's primary in Connecticut. I see either result of today's election between Lieberman and Lamont as being a potential victory for the Republican Party. How so, you might ask? It's very simple, if Lamont...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eyes On Connecticut</strong></p>
<p>I eagerly await the results of today&#8217;s primary in Connecticut. I see either result of today&#8217;s election between Lieberman and Lamont as being a potential victory for the Republican Party. How so, you might ask? It&#8217;s very simple, if Lamont&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
