September 7th, 2006 2:01 pm
Democrats are suddenly opposed to free speech, now that ABC is allegedly airing a miniseries that depicts the Clinton administration buffoons as anything but terrorist-killing superheroes of the universe.
A furious Bill Clinton is warning ABC that its mini-series “The Path to 9/11″ grossly misrepresents his pursuit of Osama bin Laden - and he is demanding the network “pull the drama” if changes aren’t made.
What’s he going to do if they don’t… Vince Foster them?
Clinton pointedly refuted several fictionalized scenes that he claims insinuate he was too distracted by the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal to care about bin Laden and that a top adviser pulled the plug on CIA operatives who were just moments away from bagging the terror master, according to a letter to ABC boss Bob Iger obtained by The Post.
Fictionalized? According to the 9/11 Commission’s Report:
Clarke wrote to Berger’s deputy on February 10 that the military was then doing targeting work to hit the main camp with cruise missiles and should be in position to strike the following morning. Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert appears to have been briefed on the situation.
No strike was launched. By February 12 Bin Ladin had apparently moved on, and the immediate strike plans became moot. According to CIA and Defense officials, policymakers were concerned about the danger that a strike would kill an Emirati prince or other senior officials who might be with Bin Ladin or close by. Clarke told us the strike was called off after consultations with Director Tenet because the intelligence was dubious, and it seemed to Clarke as if the CIA was presenting an option to attack America’s best counterterrorism ally in the Gulf. The lead CIA official in the field, Gary Schroen, felt that the intelligence reporting in this case was very reliable; the Bin Ladin unit chief, “Mike,” agreed. Schroen believes today that this was a lost opportunity to kill Bin Ladin before 9/11.
and…
The former president also disputed the portrayal of then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright as having tipped off Pakistani officials that a strike was coming, giving bin Laden a chance to flee.
He’s right. It wasn’t Albright and Pakistan, it was Richard Clarke and the UAE:
On March 7, 1999, Clarke called a UAE official to express his concerns about possible associations between Emirati officials and Bin Ladin. Clarke later wrote in a memorandum of this conversation that the call had been approved at an interagency meeting and cleared with the CIA. When the former Bin Ladin unit chief found out about Clarke’s call, he questioned CIA officials, who denied having given such a clearance. Imagery confirmed that less than a week after Clarke’s phone call the camp was hurriedly dismantled, and the site was deserted. CIA officers, including Deputy Director for Operations Pavitt, were irate. “Mike” thought the dismantling of the camp erased a possible site for targeting Bin Ladin.
And then there’s Sandy Bergler. You remember him, don’t you? He’s the former Clinton National Security Adviser and policy adviser to the John Kerry presidential campaign who pled guilty to stealing and destroying “sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration’s handling of al-Qaida terror threats”. Well, he’s written a letter to ABC as well:
I am especially troubled by a scene described to me in which CIA operatives in Afghanistan have al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in their sights and seek authorization to attack. This is followed by a scene in which an actor portraying “Sandy Berger” refuses on behalf of the President to authorize a strike despite the urgent pleadings of CIA officials. This alleged “missed opportunity” to get bin Laden is followed by al Qaeda’s attack on our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and eventually, the devastating events of 9/11.
No such episode ever occurred – nor did anything like it. There is nothing in the 9/11 Commission Report (the purported basis of your film) to support this portrayal and the fabrication of this scene (of such apparent magnitude) cannot be justified under any reasonable definition of dramatic license. In no instance did President Clinton or I ever fail to support a request from the CIA or US military to authorize an operation against bin Laden or al Qaeda.
Oh really? Accordng to the 9/11 Commission’s Report, Berger was involved in at least 4 occurences of “failing to support” such requests.
1. Early 1998:
In Washington, Berger expressed doubt about the dependability of the tribals. In his meeting with Tenet, Berger focused most, however, on the question of what was to be done with Bin Ladin if he were actually captured. He worried that the hard evidence against Bin Ladin was still skimpy and that there was a danger of snatching him and bringing him to the United States only to see him acquitted.
Then, even after the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania:
2. Dec. 4, 1999:
National Security Council counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke sent Berger a memo suggesting a strike against al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan. According to the commission, however, in the “margin next to Clarke’s suggestion to attack Al Qaeda facilities in the week before January 1, 2000, Berger wrote, ‘no.’“
2. August 2000:
Berger was presented with a plan to attack bin Laden based on aerial surveillance from a “Predator” drone. “In the memo’s margin,” the commission said, “Berger wrote that before considering action, ‘I will want more than verified location: we will need, at least, data on pattern of movements to provide some assurance he will remain in place.’”
3. June 1999:
The potential target was an al-Qaida terrorist camp in Afghanistan known as Tarnak Farms. But the commission cites Berger’s handwritten notes on the meeting paper, which referred to “the presence of 7 to 11 families in the Tarnak Farms facility, which could mean 60-65 casualties.” The Berger notes said, “if he responds, we’re blamed.”
But aside from all that, yeah, the movie’s inaccurate.
But, unfortunately it appears ABC has caved to the Clinton threats. (But is it really a surprise that Robert Iger would step in?)
Makes one wonder even more just what was in those “sensitive after-action reports on the Clinton administration’s handling of al-Qaida terror threats” that Sandy Bergler stole from the National Archives and subsequently destroyed.
Update:
I apologize for insinuating that the Clinton administration didn’t have an approach to dealing with terrorism. I’ve uncovered proof of just how they dealt with it:
Update 2:
In response to the argument that the Clinton administration didn’t pass on a chance to get bin Laden… Here are Clinton’s own words (audio file).
“Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1991, then he went to Sudan. And we’d been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start meeting with them again.
They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here, because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.
And if a tape recording of Bill Clinton admitting such isn’t enough, how about videotape of bin Laden from a U.S. drone plane? As NBC rightly asks: “The CIA had pictures. Why wasn’t the al-Qaida leader captured or killed?” Maybe the answer lies somewhere in the ruins of Sandy Bergler’s shredder.
Update 3:
Looks like Democrats are actually threatening what amounts to true censorship.
Update 4:
SENATE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP URGES DISNEY CEO TO CANCEL MISLEADING 9/11 MINISERIES. Amazing.
Update 5:
Is this Stolen Honor, Part 2 (hat tip: Allah)?
Sinclair Broadcasting owns 62 local TV stations around the country. It planned to air Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal on about 40 of them in October 2004. That would be right before the presidential election. But the Kerry campaign got wind of it and threatened Sinclair that its licenses might be in jeopardy if it aired the doc and Kerry happened to win.
Update 6:
Feel free to contact ABC and let them know what you think about this.
ABC, Inc.
500 S. Buena Vista Street
Burbank, CA 91521-4551
Web Form: http://abc.go.com/site/contactus.html
(818) 460-7477
Update 7:
Here’s an interesting take on this whole episode:
A Right and Responsibility to Speak Out
…America has always been stronger when we have not only proclaimed free speech, but listened to it. Yes, in every war, there have been those who demand suppression and silencing….Dismissing dissent is not only wrong, but dangerous when America’s leadership is unwilling to admit mistakes, unwilling to engage in honest discussion of the nation’s direction, and unwilling to hold itself accountable for the consequences of decisions made without genuine disclosure, or genuine debate….
Think this is the commentary of some rightwinger reflecting upon the Democrat leadership’s threats against ABC for airing the miniseries? Think again. It was spoken by former Democrat presidential candidate John Kerry in April of this year. Hypocrisy much?
Update 8:
Jamie Allman has a video rant about this story.
Others:
MKH is covering the edits…
SisterToldjah has a great roundup.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Texas Rainmaker is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
Graphics by: Margolis Media Works | Style by: Lisa Sabin - E.Webscapes
Scene from Path to 9-11 is not ‘fake but accurate’ as some suggest (UPDATE VI - 4:25 PM)
The lefty outrage over ABC’s upcoming docudrama “The Path to 9-11” is still raging out of control. There has been a blog created specifically in an attempt to refute claims made by the movie. Clinton admnistration officials are assa…
Trackback by Sister Toldjah — 2:32 pm
The party of diversity that cries ‘every voice must be heard’ is once again telling someone to shut up. What creeps.
Comment by DavidG — 4:14 pm
Chapter And Verse From the 9/11 Commission
Terrific stuff from Texas Rainmaker. Not sure if the film depicts these events precisely accurately, as I haven’t seen it. But damning stuff. It does not seem now that the film depicts something fictitious — soldiers about to bust in…
Trackback by Ace of Spades HQ — 6:25 pm
thank you for all the info in one organized place—-it’s gonna go aaaaaaaalllllllllllll around right now….
Comment by catroina — 6:55 pm
[…] It appears as if ABC has caved under the pressure of former President Bill Clinton, but none of that really matters too much. There’s no question it’s a bit disheartening Clinton is so worried about his legacy, and perhaps his wife’s chance at running in 2008, that he wants to erase as much truth as he can. The alleged scene in which Clinton most objects to is backed up (do read that entire link) by the very 9/11 Commission Report the miniseries is supposed to be partially based upon. That said, does it really matter? We still know Al Qaida formed and grew exponentially in the Clinton years. We know Clinton had at least 7 chances to kill or capture OBL, one of which was a direct handoff revolving no action at all. Clinton though wants to remake history and claim he was always worried about AQ. That’s a load and we all know it, unless you’re the type that believes the word of a man who walked into the national archives and stuffed unknown documents down his pants and socks. We still haven’t seen what Sandy Burglar stole that day and his fuzzy recollection is rather Clintonesque. […]
Pingback by In the Bullpen » It’s Just a Movie — 6:56 pm
[…] Pirate’s Cove Pirate’s Michelle Malkin (First article) Pirate’s Michelle Malkin (Second article) The Political Pit Bull Dan Riehl via NewsBusters Mary Katharine Ham via Town Hall Blog The Ostroy Report Hot Air Flopping Aces Ace Of Spades HQ Texas Rainmaker Sister Toldjah […]
Pingback by The World According To Carl — 6:58 pm
Random Musings
Don’t you get the feeling that quite a few folks wish that the Clinton Administration attacked the terrorists with such vigor as he and others on the Left are attacking ABC for the upcoming miniseries The Path to 9/11, which appears to portray the Cl…
Trackback by A Blog For All — 7:16 pm
[…] Update: If you’re going to link, don’t link this post. Link Texas Rainmaker’s. That’s another way to stick this incident up Reid’s ass — use it as an opportunity to discuss Clinton’s record as a miserable failure, to borrow another favored left-wing term, on terrorism. […]
Pingback by Hot Air » Blog Archive » Thugs for life: Dems threaten ABC’s broadcast license over “Path to 9/11″ — 7:24 pm
Well Billy Boy’s own words should be damning enough but of course the American People won’t hear those. He had Bin Laden but found it “inconvenient” to do his primary job, protect the American People. And don’t get me started on Sandy Bergler.
Comment by Leo Flood — 7:51 pm
[…] The Cover Up Continues Slick Willy Still At It […]
Pingback by The Ward View » Blog Archive » Clinton diverts the TV show, but not the attacks. — 8:22 pm
Democrats Threaten ABC’s Broadcast License Over ‘The Path To 9/11′
Seriously, Mullah Omar would be proud. And yes, by the way, to all the liberals reading this: I absolutely just compared Democrats to the Taliban. Usually I have nothing but contempt for such comparisons and regard them as poisonous to…
Trackback by The Political Pit Bull — 8:22 pm
Just another example of the Left’s hypocrisy.
I am stunned that anyone actually listens to these people about anything.
Comment by Lonevoice — 8:30 pm
FCC Threats Clinton’s Final Folly - A Prediction
Riehl World View
While irrelevant to my point, the ever in search of a legacy president’s failed history as Commander-In-Chief is well documented. You can catch up on that at Texas Rainmaker and view a round up via Mary Katherine Ham. The Democrats h…
Trackback by Blog-o-Fascists — 8:33 pm
[…] Must Link to Texas Rainmaker! By far the best roundup I have read! Here is what he reports: […]
Pingback by Right Voices » Blog Archive » Senate Democrats Threaten To Pull ABC’s Broadcast License! — 8:57 pm
Dems revise 9/11 to cover up for Clinton
t’s been five years since the attacks of 9/11 and the Democrats’ “Ministry of Truth” have succeeded in bullying ABC into altering their “docudrama” The Path to 9/11, which was based on The 9/11 Commissions Report. Funny, the Dems were all for th…
Trackback by reverse_vampyr — 9:11 pm
Hard Out There for a Mouse
Imagine for a second if the Republicans did this. The Democrats have threatened ABC over the “Path to 9/11″ miniseries. Allah has a copy of the letter at the link above, and asks:My only question is this: was that letter…
Trackback by Slublog — 9:12 pm
Dems threaten government censorship if they don’t get their own way …
I have tried to stay out of the fray regarding the upcoming miniseries, The Path to 9/11 which is due to air over two nights on 10 and 11 September. It is impossible not to know that former President Bill Clinton is ballistic, that Madeline Albright an…
Trackback by Squiggler — 9:21 pm
[…] ChicagoRay Pink Flamingo Blue Crab Boulevard Hot Air Texas Rainmaker […]
Pingback by Plus + Ultra » Blog Archive » ABC 9/11 Movie; ‘It’s All Lies’, Bill Ejaculates — 9:34 pm
ABC’s 9/11 Miniseries
So ABC is going to change its 9/11 miniseries under pressure from Clinton and his minions about a scene which is meant as an amalgam of all of Clinton’s failures to capture Osama Bin Laden.
Fine, then rather than removing or modifying the scene, AB…
Trackback by Sensible Mom — 9:39 pm
Bill’s Bites
The webmaster’s blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated and bumped, newest items at the top. 22:34 Coburn-Obama Federal Spending Database Passes — Unanimously!Ed Morrissey The Senate has busted through the holds put on by members and passed S2590, t…
Trackback by Old War Dogs — 10:03 pm
Just unbelievable
Read everything here (Hot Air) and here (Texas Rainmaker) first, then come back for my comments.All done?This…
Trackback by Prophetic Musings — 10:44 pm
Democrats Threaten ABC’s Broadcast License Over Path To 9/11
This is getting a little out of hand. You’ve got to wonder what is in this film that Democrats are so angry about? Going even so far as to threaten ABC with censorship, you know it’s got to be bad…
Trackback by Say Anything — 10:46 pm
[…] I wasn’t going to write on this until the nightly news led with “Paris Hilton’s DUI”…but all I see is the Democrats killing free speech. Everything important is here, so I won’t address what’s been hit on over and over…instead, I’ll let the Democrats do the talking. I could care less about “The Path to 9/11″ if it were a theatrical release, as F/911 was. You can pay for, and see anything you want in a theater. But it absolutely incenses me that this is going out over the public airwaves, which you and I own. And for free too, a $30 million donation to the Republicans. […]
Pingback by The Stout Republican » Blog Archive » Death of Free Speech — 11:41 pm
Democrats Are The Evil Among Us and Enemy Within
The Senate Democratic leadership just threatened Disney’s broadcast license.
Trackback by PC Free Zone — 12:00 am
…And the Gloves Come Off
Hot Air’s Allahpundit and Bryan have been furiously keeping up with the day’s developments over ABC’s “The Path to 9/11.”
Hugh Hewitt has taken notice as well
Texas Rainmaker has an excellent synthesis of the cover-up, as well as (gasp!) actua…
Trackback by Fake Turkey — 12:45 am
Path to 9/11 and Phase II of the SSCI Report
So on the same day that it’s announced that ABC will give into pressure from Clinton Administration officals ,and alter scenes which reflect the miserable failure of their counterterrorism policies, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is rele…
Trackback by KURU Lounge — 5:27 am
Jason, I tried to do a TrackBack, but HaloScan was confused by your URI. I posted the following over at ‘Old Soldier:’
This is probably the hottest subject on the blogosphere right now. For excellent coverage of the subject please go to TexasRainmaker for Jason’s take via ‘The Cover Up Continues’.
Comment by Old Soldier — 5:49 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Democratic Hypocrisy — 6:58 am
A Dangerous Precedent
Government officials threaten and intimidate television broadcasters with tactics that would make Josef Stalin proud. But then there are plenty of ideological tenants shared by both Soviet Communists and Democrats. Obviously a big one is censorship. Th…
Trackback by Ex-Donkey Blog — 7:08 am
[…] 2. Evidence in coming to light that ABC’s “dramatization” isn’t too far off. The Texas Rainmaker uses the 9/11 Commission Report, among other things, to blow the Dems complaints out of the water, and NewsBusters talks to Michael Scheuer, who was the “Mike” in the 9/11 Commission Report and is no fan of the President to clarify that which the Rainmaker posts. […]
Pingback by Random Nuclear Strikes » It took them a week — 7:48 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » 9/11 Commission Report isn’t the ONLY source for the Path to 9/11 — 8:56 am
[…] A lot of people are raising a big fuss about the reaction of the Senate Democrats and the Clinton people against the ABC mini-series. To be fair, the ABC mini-series does contain some fictionalized dramatizations. I don’t mind the Clintons and the Democrats arguing that the series portrays them unfairly, especially in light of that fictionalization. They shouldn’t be trying to stop the show from airing though, which they have done to previous shows that were politically unfavorable to them, whereas I can’t recall the last time I saw the Republicans try and get a series pulled for political reasons. […]
Pingback by The ABC 9/11 controversy « Tai-Chi Policy — 9:41 am
[…] While this latest skinny-finger flick lacks the variety of options enjoyed by the Katrina blame-gamers, it’s a much more strenuous work-out, and those accusatory digits are flexing and stretching with great energy. It’s not just the same-old, though; to add interest, the marketers and producers invited our schoolchildren to join this latest national carnival. […]
Pingback by Polimom Says » No fat fingers in polarized America — 10:11 am
[…] Texas Rainmaker » The Cover Up Continues rounds out why–although there are certain things alleged to have occurred in the flick take “artistic license,” they are far closer to the truth than Danny Rather’s totally faked memos. […]
Pingback by LeatherPenguin » How Stupid Can All These People Be? — 11:05 am
[…] Texas Rainmaker » The Cover Up Continues Democrats are suddenly opposed to free speech, now that ABC is allegedly airing a miniseries that depicts the Clinton administration buffoons as anything but terrorist-killing superheroes of the universe. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]
Pingback by 186k Per Second - » A Picture of Clinton’s security policy - Worth 186k words ! — 11:29 am
Seems to me that if the movie was accurate, they wouldn’t feel pressured to cave in. My guess is it wasn’t. Gee, I wonder why they sent copies of the film to right-wingers but not any of the lefties? Hmmmm . . . trying to hide something?
Comment by Bern — 1:05 pm
Theater make-up defines an actor’s features.
The Democrat’s make-up shows their Stalinist characteristics.
Comment by Zooomie — 3:24 pm
ABC’s ‘Path to 9/11′
Hypocrisy.
Trackback by Conservative Blog Therapy — 3:55 pm
[…] Texas Rainmaker has compiled a complete dossier on Bill Clinton, miserable failure. […]
Pingback by Inoperable Terran » Kos and the DNC don’t want you to read this post — 6:12 pm
Jason:
Excellent point by point refutation of the Democrats sputtering attempts to run the brains of the American people through another of their spin cycles.
What I find especially troubling about the Democrat campaign against this film is the offical letter from their Senate leadership.
If President Bush or any elected official sent a similar letter in their official capacity to a broadcaster the left would call them “Hitler” and claim we are living in a “police state.”
Oops! They do that already don’t they? And THEY are the ones trying to control political speech.
Comment by Mike's America — 11:32 pm
The Laughable Left Are Funnier Than a Disney Film
The Clinton Administration’s approach to terrorism gets a cigar in ABC’s 9/11 mini-series.
Trackback by A Tic In The Mind's Eye — 5:48 am
[…] As he pointed out back then, the context in which the lead up to the Iraq war occurred was in the wake of 9/11. That’s the connection to 9/11 the Bush administration has continually made. In the context of having endured the worst terror attack on our soil, we could not afford to let growing threats (related or not to the 9/11 perpetrators themselves) materialize before deciding to act. As this upcoming miniseries on ABC shows, the cost of ignoring growing threats is high. […]
Pingback by Texas Rainmaker » Monday Morning Quarterbacks Hypocrites — 8:18 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » ABC airs Path to 9/11 — 7:10 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » The Real Story of The Path to 9/11 — 7:44 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » The Real Reason to Remember 9/11 — 8:32 am
[…] Democrats sure know how to memorialize, don’t they? To them, everything is about scoring political points. Everything. No Comments » […]
Pingback by Texas Rainmaker » Congressman Jim Moran Moron — 4:46 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » The Devil and his Angels — 7:56 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Detainee Deal - A significant win for our security — 9:55 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Clinton Unleashed — 8:33 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Bin Laden Dead? — 10:42 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Blaming the Disease on the Cure — 7:53 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Clinton, a modern day King Saul — 1:54 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » British to ask Muslims for permission before fighting terror — 3:33 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » It’s all in the Timing — 6:18 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Democratic Hypocrisy -II — 6:26 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Fact Checking the Fact Checked Challenged Clinton — 8:16 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » And now for a Karzai smackdown of Democrats — 12:46 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Rice smacks down Clinton — 12:49 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Bring on that NIE — 12:50 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Hillary Hoof in Mouth — 5:52 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Absolute Democrat Denial — 7:43 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » More Fact Checking Clinton Static — 8:29 am
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Paul Pillar rises from under the Rock — 12:45 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » The so-called “Radical Fringe” of Islam — 1:39 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » The Goosie-Gander Olbermann — 6:54 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Did Olbermann pull a Morton Downey? — 1:11 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » Ashcroft on the attack — 9:54 pm
[…] […]
Pingback by Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense » Blog Archive » For Olbermann, his TV ratings aren’t the only thing that down — 7:30 am
New Hampshire ups listings
[…] the ping tes to see if the machine is a alive - shutdown take too long for me - when it times out - so I just skip dead machines. All that is left is to set up your machine name lists and set up an automatic scheduled event to do the […]
Trackback by New Hampshire ups listings — 11:12 am