<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Victory Roadmap</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tax preparation in North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-204588</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-204588</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;tax preparation in North Dakota&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] issues largely spring from the fact that Intent for a Nation embraces the same flawed analysis of its namesake. Four decades after the publication of Lament for a Nation, nationalists continue to cling to the same gloomy predictions. All [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>tax preparation in North Dakota</strong></p>
<p>[&#8230;] issues largely spring from the fact that Intent for a Nation embraces the same flawed analysis of its namesake. Four decades after the publication of Lament for a Nation, nationalists continue to cling to the same gloomy predictions. All [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: endorendil</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-14059</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-14059</guid>
					<description>ooh, dead silence. Love it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooh, dead silence. Love it&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: endorendil</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13949</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13949</guid>
					<description>TR, I agree that the federal government is a good lot larger than it would like the public to know. But it's not like that kind of false accounting started with Clinton, nor did it end with Bush Junior. 

But you do agree that Reagan, BS and BJ expanded federal government more than Clinton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TR, I agree that the federal government is a good lot larger than it would like the public to know. But it&#8217;s not like that kind of false accounting started with Clinton, nor did it end with Bush Junior. </p>
<p>But you do agree that Reagan, BS and BJ expanded federal government more than Clinton?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13932</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13932</guid>
					<description>endorendil, your claim about Clinton is misleading.  The Clinton administration played games with the numbers by not counting the many thousands of contractors, grantees, and state and local governments that delivered services on behalf of the federal government.  And he padded the "reduction" with the shrinking numbers in the military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>endorendil, your claim about Clinton is misleading.  The Clinton administration played games with the numbers by not counting the many thousands of contractors, grantees, and state and local governments that delivered services on behalf of the federal government.  And he padded the &#8220;reduction&#8221; with the shrinking numbers in the military.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: endorendil</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13928</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13928</guid>
					<description>TR, I didn't say anything about Pelosi, or the veracity of Newt's little platform.

And if you look at the size of federal government, you'll find it increased with Reagan, BS and BJ, but not under Clinton. Republicans love to talk about reducing the government, but they always end up enlarging it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TR, I didn&#8217;t say anything about Pelosi, or the veracity of Newt&#8217;s little platform.</p>
<p>And if you look at the size of federal government, you&#8217;ll find it increased with Reagan, BS and BJ, but not under Clinton. Republicans love to talk about reducing the government, but they always end up enlarging it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Take a Good Look &#171; Tai-Chi Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13913</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13913</guid>
					<description>[...] Commentators all over have been pointing out the past couple days that as bad as the republicans currently are, the democrats have already promised to be worse on every important issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Commentators all over have been pointing out the past couple days that as bad as the republicans currently are, the democrats have already promised to be worse on every important issue. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tai-Chi Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13914</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13914</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Take a Good Look&lt;/strong&gt;

Commentators all over have been pointing out the past couple days that as bad as the republicans currently are, the democrats have already promised to be worse on every important issue.
Their openly admitted plan is:
Increase taxes across the board (wh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Take a Good Look</strong></p>
<p>Commentators all over have been pointing out the past couple days that as bad as the republicans currently are, the democrats have already promised to be worse on every important issue.<br />
Their openly admitted plan is:<br />
Increase taxes across the board (wh&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tai-Chi Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13915</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13915</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Take a Good Look&lt;/strong&gt;

Commentators all over have been pointing out the past couple days that as bad as the republicans currently are, the democrats have already promised to be worse on every important issue.
Their openly admitted plan is:
Increase taxes across the board (wh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Take a Good Look</strong></p>
<p>Commentators all over have been pointing out the past couple days that as bad as the republicans currently are, the democrats have already promised to be worse on every important issue.<br />
Their openly admitted plan is:<br />
Increase taxes across the board (wh&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13887</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13887</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;but if you think it would get smaller under Democrat control, you’re smoking crack.&lt;/i&gt;

I disagree, Jason.  It would definitely get smaller...the defense budget, anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but if you think it would get smaller under Democrat control, you’re smoking crack.</i></p>
<p>I disagree, Jason.  It would definitely get smaller&#8230;the defense budget, anyway!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13883</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2006/10/16/gop-victory-roadmap/#comment-13883</guid>
					<description>"&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Hm, sounds like all Newt has is scare tactics and reactionary tripe. Not very inspirational. Not even very interesting.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;"

I like how you acknowledge that Nancy Pelosi's voting record is scary.

"&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Remind me what laws Republicans will actually pass when the get to power? Oh, never mind, they’ve already had 6 years in power.  What are they going to do? Further increase the size of government?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;"

I agree that the federal gubmint has gotten too big under Republican control, but if you think it would get smaller under Democrat control, you're smoking crack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<b><i>Hm, sounds like all Newt has is scare tactics and reactionary tripe. Not very inspirational. Not even very interesting.</i></b>&#8221;</p>
<p>I like how you acknowledge that Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s voting record is scary.</p>
<p>&#8220;<b><i>Remind me what laws Republicans will actually pass when the get to power? Oh, never mind, they’ve already had 6 years in power.  What are they going to do? Further increase the size of government?</i></b>&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree that the federal gubmint has gotten too big under Republican control, but if you think it would get smaller under Democrat control, you&#8217;re smoking crack.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
