Comments on: Suddenly Democrats Don’t Find Obstructionism So Appealing http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/ When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:45:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Celt4Christ http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36834 Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:56:47 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36834 Looking back at my comment, I believe I meant "for obstructionism," not "before." That's what happens when you try to be witty at 4am. Looking back at my comment, I believe I meant “for obstructionism,” not “before.” That’s what happens when you try to be witty at 4am.

]]> by: Celt4Christ http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36468 Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:04:47 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36468 Yes, I believe that's exactly what you heard. Do as I say, not as I do. Or did. I guess they were before obstructionism before they were against it? Yes, I believe that’s exactly what you heard. Do as I say, not as I do. Or did. I guess they were before obstructionism before they were against it?

]]> by: Henry Dorsett Case http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36453 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:25:29 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36453 Did I hear Mr. Frank correctly? Did he say, in essence, "it doesn't matter if I did it yesterday, it's horribly wrong and childish now"? I mean, I don't want to run afoul of a tu quoque fallacy here, but if you're going to claim that a particular course of action is so heinous, perhaps it might be a good idea first to distance yourself from when you did it in the past. Did I hear Mr. Frank correctly? Did he say, in essence, “it doesn’t matter if I did it yesterday, it’s horribly wrong and childish now”?

I mean, I don’t want to run afoul of a tu quoque fallacy here, but if you’re going to claim that a particular course of action is so heinous, perhaps it might be a good idea first to distance yourself from when you did it in the past.

]]> by: crushliberalism http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36430 Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:47:22 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36430 <i>You made your bed, Democrats… now lie in it. </i> Jason, I don't know that inviting Barney Frank to lie in a bed is a good idea! :-D You made your bed, Democrats… now lie in it.

Jason, I don’t know that inviting Barney Frank to lie in a bed is a good idea! :-D

]]> by: The Thomas Chronicles » Query: Where did “Progressive” come from? http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36429 Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:37:20 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/01/14/suddenly-democrats-dont-find-obstructionism-so-appealing/#comment-36429 [...] Gay Patriot: The Wholly Unserious and Very Superficial Democrats Atlas Shrugs: Atlas VLOGS the New Congress Hot Air: Video: Barney Frank throws a fit … on the House floor Texas Rainmaker: Suddenly Democrats don’t find obstructionism so appealing [...] […] Gay Patriot: The Wholly Unserious and Very Superficial Democrats Atlas Shrugs: Atlas VLOGS the New Congress Hot Air: Video: Barney Frank throws a fit … on the House floor Texas Rainmaker: Suddenly Democrats don’t find obstructionism so appealing […]

]]>