For those of you who claim to “support the troops, but oppose the war”, here are a few words from those troops you claim to support:

Sorry, but even those “dumb, lazy kids” see through your BS.

1. When our troops are in harm’s way, “supporting” them means giving them everything they need to be successful at their mission. Any deficiency in support that prolongs the war, emboldens the enemy to hold on longer, or lowers the morale of the troops is not “support”.

   Comment by SouthernRoots — 9:55 am
   

2. Lying to the public about the reasons the troops are being sent in could be construed as preemptive lack of support, it seems. Likewise with failing to send the proper amount of troops to do the job, as specified by military commanders.

   Comment by blackshards — 5:05 pm
   

3. Hmm, how about not lying about why we are sending troops into harms way in the first place? Um, where are the weapons of mass destruction that we heard about over and over and over and over… Besides, wasn’t the Mission Accomplished, so what are our men and women still doing over there?

   Comment by catbobb — 5:13 pm
   

4. “Hmm, how about not lying about why we are sending troops into harms way in the first place? Um, where are the weapons of mass destruction that we heard about over and over and over and over…”

   Yeah, what about those lies?

   Comment by Texas Rainmaker — 5:28 pm
   

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

You must be logged in to post a comment.