<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Pork to Fight the Islamic Terrorists</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker &#187; Tax Day is Upon Us&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-53456</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-53456</guid>
					<description>[...] &#8230;and 535 members of Congress want to waste the rest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8230;and 535 members of Congress want to waste the rest. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Sound of Opportunity Knocking &#8230; &#171; ConservaBlogs.com</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-51334</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-51334</guid>
					<description>[...] Liberals passed ‘The Largest Tax Increase in History’ as reported at Hegemonic Pundit. James Whittington exposes Liberal longings for their glory days of mixed media martial arts in ‘Democrat Deja Vu’. Texas Rainmaker BBQ’d Liberals providing ‘More Pork for Islamic Terrorists’. Ed, at Captain’s Quarters showed us the Liberal’s Ms. Pelosi ‘Feeding Foes and Starving Friends’ as she led the House to condemn our ally Turkey for 100 year old actions and then left to visit the Islamists in Syria for a while. All this in just one week. Unfortunately, there’s even more if I wanted to take the time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Liberals passed ‘The Largest Tax Increase in History’ as reported at Hegemonic Pundit. James Whittington exposes Liberal longings for their glory days of mixed media martial arts in ‘Democrat Deja Vu’. Texas Rainmaker BBQ’d Liberals providing ‘More Pork for Islamic Terrorists’. Ed, at Captain’s Quarters showed us the Liberal’s Ms. Pelosi ‘Feeding Foes and Starving Friends’ as she led the House to condemn our ally Turkey for 100 year old actions and then left to visit the Islamists in Syria for a while. All this in just one week. Unfortunately, there’s even more if I wanted to take the time. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-50628</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-50628</guid>
					<description>Forrest,
I think we finally found something on which we can agree.  It's a catch-22 problem though, as those who would have to reform the system are the ones screwing it up in the first place.

The ironic thing is that they justify the appropriation for the conventions is needed to "help defray the costs".  Defray them from whom?  It's just taking from one account and putting it in another... and we're funding all the accounts, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forrest,<br />
I think we finally found something on which we can agree.  It&#8217;s a catch-22 problem though, as those who would have to reform the system are the ones screwing it up in the first place.</p>
<p>The ironic thing is that they justify the appropriation for the conventions is needed to &#8220;help defray the costs&#8221;.  Defray them from whom?  It&#8217;s just taking from one account and putting it in another&#8230; and we&#8217;re funding all the accounts, anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-50627</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/03/27/more-pork-to-fight-the-islamic-terrorists/#comment-50627</guid>
					<description>I am thoroughly disgusted with the amount of the money that is spent on political party conventions.  While most other pork projects are not preferable, they usually hold some form of public benefit.  

The political party convention spending is outrageous.  I hate how closely the two major parties have woven their way into the government.  At an organizational level, they are really no different than any other private group.  That they are awarded such heaping amounts of money from the public by way of the government is disgusting.  If they want to have the big parties and events they hold, they ought to pay for them the way other private organizations should by raising the money themselves rather than collecting handouts via forced taxation of the public.

Both parties are guilty of pork spending.  When the Republicans controlled Congress they spent on projects in their own states to help their chances of maintaining/growing their majority.  I really wish there was a strong, viable movement that cut this type of spending back in a truly bipartisan fashion.  And once that was accomplished, I'd gladly support legislation to disentangle the two parties from the government and force them back to what they really should be, private political organizations, rather than what they've made themselves into as public government organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thoroughly disgusted with the amount of the money that is spent on political party conventions.  While most other pork projects are not preferable, they usually hold some form of public benefit.  </p>
<p>The political party convention spending is outrageous.  I hate how closely the two major parties have woven their way into the government.  At an organizational level, they are really no different than any other private group.  That they are awarded such heaping amounts of money from the public by way of the government is disgusting.  If they want to have the big parties and events they hold, they ought to pay for them the way other private organizations should by raising the money themselves rather than collecting handouts via forced taxation of the public.</p>
<p>Both parties are guilty of pork spending.  When the Republicans controlled Congress they spent on projects in their own states to help their chances of maintaining/growing their majority.  I really wish there was a strong, viable movement that cut this type of spending back in a truly bipartisan fashion.  And once that was accomplished, I&#8217;d gladly support legislation to disentangle the two parties from the government and force them back to what they really should be, private political organizations, rather than what they&#8217;ve made themselves into as public government organizations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

