<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Who Won the Debate?</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MrCynic1</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/#comment-57686</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/#comment-57686</guid>
					<description>Does it even matter at this point though? With the election more then a year away does anything anyone say really matter right now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it even matter at this point though? With the election more then a year away does anything anyone say really matter right now?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nathan Tabor</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/#comment-57538</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 21:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/#comment-57538</guid>
					<description>Despite the fact that a great deal of attention was lavished on the big three, I thought Duncan Hunter represented his positions well and gave substantive answers on the issues of national security and border control. Hunter's credentials are certainly solid enough to warrant a closer look by the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the fact that a great deal of attention was lavished on the big three, I thought Duncan Hunter represented his positions well and gave substantive answers on the issues of national security and border control. Hunter&#8217;s credentials are certainly solid enough to warrant a closer look by the media.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HotOffThePress</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/#comment-57322</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/04/so-who-won-the-debate/#comment-57322</guid>
					<description>I watched the Republican Presidential Candidates Debate broadcast live from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., and was left thinking Newt Gingrich and Fred Thompson came away clear winners.

That’s right!  Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, and Thompson, the Law and Order star and former U.S. senator from Tennessee, can declare victory simply because both were smart enough to skip the event for two likely reasons:

First, because it’s taking place far too early to be remembered by voters 9 or more months from now;

and

Second, because video clips and sound bites from the event will serve Democrat candidates’ needs more than Republicans, a result of the fact that many of the questions were “loaded” with liberal bias in a variety of ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the Republican Presidential Candidates Debate broadcast live from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., and was left thinking Newt Gingrich and Fred Thompson came away clear winners.</p>
<p>That’s right!  Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, and Thompson, the Law and Order star and former U.S. senator from Tennessee, can declare victory simply because both were smart enough to skip the event for two likely reasons:</p>
<p>First, because it’s taking place far too early to be remembered by voters 9 or more months from now;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Second, because video clips and sound bites from the event will serve Democrat candidates’ needs more than Republicans, a result of the fact that many of the questions were “loaded” with liberal bias in a variety of ways.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
