Comments on: Al-Qaida Knows Who Its Allies Are… http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/ When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:24:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Texas Rainmaker » Democrats Want More Protections for Everyone EXCEPT American Citizens http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-66299 Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:52:44 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-66299 [...] It won’t be long before they grant voting rights to al-Qaida members… And it’s pretty clear how they’d vote. No Comments » [...] […] It won’t be long before they grant voting rights to al-Qaida members… And it’s pretty clear how they’d vote. No Comments » […]

]]> by: endorendil http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-61913 Mon, 21 May 2007 10:28:08 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-61913 FreeFall, I think SgtTaylor wasn't answering my post. FreeFall, I think SgtTaylor wasn’t answering my post.

]]> by: FreeFall http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-61195 Thu, 17 May 2007 01:38:58 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-61195 Good call SgtTaylor. Guess Endorendils gonna have to move back to accusing President Bush of Blowing up the World Trade Center, that is after reading his Rosie Odonnell fan club letter. Good call SgtTaylor. Guess Endorendils gonna have to move back to accusing President Bush of Blowing up the World Trade Center, that is after reading his Rosie Odonnell fan club letter.

]]> by: SgtTaylor http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-61006 Wed, 16 May 2007 05:42:34 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-61006 Daniel, YOU believe the American Military sancitons "rape rooms"?!!!!! No they don't. For example the soldiers involved in the Abu Graib Photo Abuses are all serving Prison Time. * Specialist Graner is serving 10 YEARS in PRISON for abusing prisoners! http://www.cdi.org/news/law/abu-ghraib-graner.cfm *Specialist Harman is serving 6 YEARS IN PRISON for abusing prisoners! http://www.tiscali.co.uk/news/newswire.php/news/reuters/2005/05/18/world/ussoldierapologizesforherabughraibabuses.html *Private First Class England is serving 3 YEARS IN PRISON for abusing prisoners! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9492624/ *Staff Sergeant Frederick is serving 8 YEARS IN PRISON for abusing prisoners! http://www.cdi.org/news/law/abu-ghra...-frederick.cfm Did you know all those photos were taken in one night during a Night Shift? The Mudville Gazette did a factually based analysis of the Abu Graib scandal: http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/001989.html Why do you beat your wife you un-American son-of-bitch? Daniel,

YOU believe the American Military sancitons “rape rooms”?!!!!!

No they don’t. For example the soldiers involved in the Abu Graib Photo Abuses are all serving Prison Time.
* Specialist Graner is serving 10 YEARS in PRISON for abusing prisoners!
http://www.cdi.org/news/law/abu-ghraib-graner.cfm

*Specialist Harman is serving 6 YEARS IN PRISON for abusing prisoners!
http://www.tiscali.co.uk/news/newswire.php/news/reuters/2005/05/18/world/ussoldierapologizesforherabughraibabuses.html

*Private First Class England is serving 3 YEARS IN PRISON for abusing prisoners!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9492624/

*Staff Sergeant Frederick is serving 8 YEARS IN PRISON for abusing prisoners!
http://www.cdi.org/news/law/abu-ghra…-frederick.cfm

Did you know all those photos were taken in one night during a Night Shift?
The Mudville Gazette did a factually based analysis of the Abu Graib scandal:
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/001989.html

Why do you beat your wife you un-American son-of-bitch?

]]> by: endorendil http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60976 Tue, 15 May 2007 21:49:46 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60976 "Well, the first step is admitting your problem. Good job, endo, now you can proceed to step 2, recognizing you need help." Very funny. Then I guess it's true that Republicans can't tell the difference between political dissent and violent terrorism. And are you saying that 66% of Americans are Democrats? Sounds promising for the next election... Friendly advice - if you're going to recommend locking up a whole section of the population, stick to the old Republican guideline: make sure it's a minority. “Well, the first step is admitting your problem. Good job, endo, now you can proceed to step 2, recognizing you need help.”

Very funny. Then I guess it’s true that Republicans can’t tell the difference between political dissent and violent terrorism. And are you saying that 66% of Americans are Democrats? Sounds promising for the next election…

Friendly advice - if you’re going to recommend locking up a whole section of the population, stick to the old Republican guideline: make sure it’s a minority.

]]> by: crushliberalism http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60959 Tue, 15 May 2007 17:29:59 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60959 <i>Hey, work hard and someday you might be successful.</i> Jerkagain...hard work and success? Dude, that's just crazy talk! Hey, work hard and someday you might be successful.

Jerkagain…hard work and success? Dude, that’s just crazy talk!

]]> by: djernigan http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60949 Tue, 15 May 2007 15:02:01 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60949 Now - you are simply lying. And incoherently to. I had no supposition. Only a semi-loaded question. Oh well. Live with yourself. Now - you are simply lying. And incoherently to. I had no supposition. Only a semi-loaded question. Oh well. Live with yourself.

]]> by: Texas Rainmaker http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60948 Tue, 15 May 2007 14:53:14 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60948 Daniel, do you not even realize I was using the loaded question <i>as the strawman</i> argument? I replaced your retarded supposition with another, similarly retarded position. Now you've run off trying to flex your googling muscle and all the while I'm wondering that since you didn't respond to my question, we must assume you're currently engaged in beating your wife. See how fun that is? Daniel, do you not even realize I was using the loaded question as the strawman argument? I replaced your retarded supposition with another, similarly retarded position. Now you’ve run off trying to flex your googling muscle and all the while I’m wondering that since you didn’t respond to my question, we must assume you’re currently engaged in beating your wife.

See how fun that is?

]]> by: djernigan http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60947 Tue, 15 May 2007 14:41:52 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60947 Huff, huff, puff, puff. I'm not the one who confused a "strawman argument" for "the loaded question fallacy." And - yes - responding to my thinking about upward mobility by citing a single example presupposed that I think upward mobility is impossible. It attributes to me a position I simply do not hold - and one which is, of course, easily refutable - and knocks that argument down - all the while ignoring my real argument (that the odds against upward mobility are so long as to be irrelevant to the issue of what constitutes reasonable taxation) No, Tex - you still haven't confronted THAT argument - but only the strawman argument you substituted in its place. CLASSIC STRAWMAN rhetorical maneuvering (http://www.fallacyfiles.org/strawman.html). Worked up over nothing? Perhaps. But even while many on the left subscribe to wishy washy epistemological relativism, I never knew someone who practiced it so well without even knowing it. Is it a strawman? Is it a loaded question? Is it a chicken? Is it a duck? Duh?!? Don't know. Guess it don't matter. Huff, huff, puff, puff. I’m not the one who confused a “strawman argument” for “the loaded question fallacy.”

And - yes - responding to my thinking about upward mobility by citing a single example presupposed that I think upward mobility is impossible. It attributes to me a position I simply do not hold - and one which is, of course, easily refutable - and knocks that argument down - all the while ignoring my real argument (that the odds against upward mobility are so long as to be irrelevant to the issue of what constitutes reasonable taxation) No, Tex - you still haven’t confronted THAT argument - but only the strawman argument you substituted in its place. CLASSIC STRAWMAN rhetorical maneuvering (http://www.fallacyfiles.org/strawman.html).

Worked up over nothing? Perhaps. But even while many on the left subscribe to wishy washy epistemological relativism, I never knew someone who practiced it so well without even knowing it. Is it a strawman? Is it a loaded question? Is it a chicken? Is it a duck? Duh?!? Don’t know. Guess it don’t matter.

]]> by: Texas Rainmaker http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60946 Tue, 15 May 2007 14:19:58 +0000 http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/05/14/al-qaida-knows-who-its-allies-are/#comment-60946 It's kinda fun to watch you get all worked up over nothing. It reminds me of my dog that suddenly notices his tail, then chases it for hours. As to your "question" - no, I do not condone rape rooms. Does that satisfy your tail wagging? As for your claim that I set up a strawman on the upward mobility issue, it's obvious you don't understand the concept of strawman. I said that it was possible for people to go from nothing to wealthy and successful, and used my own example as just one bit of proof... I realize this is probably what makes you envious enough of my law degree to constantly try and put it down. Hey, work hard and someday you might be successful. Until then, just stay addicted to my successful blog and keep coming back for more treats. Sit. Roll over. Good boy. It’s kinda fun to watch you get all worked up over nothing. It reminds me of my dog that suddenly notices his tail, then chases it for hours.

As to your “question” - no, I do not condone rape rooms. Does that satisfy your tail wagging?

As for your claim that I set up a strawman on the upward mobility issue, it’s obvious you don’t understand the concept of strawman. I said that it was possible for people to go from nothing to wealthy and successful, and used my own example as just one bit of proof… I realize this is probably what makes you envious enough of my law degree to constantly try and put it down. Hey, work hard and someday you might be successful. Until then, just stay addicted to my successful blog and keep coming back for more treats.

Sit. Roll over. Good boy.

]]>