<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About the &#8220;Jena 6&#8243;</title>
	<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/</link>
	<description>When I wake up I read the Bible and the newspaper... because I want to know what both sides are up to.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: crushliberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-114012</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-114012</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Liberals like you have come and gone many times over during that time. Each thinks heâ€™s the brightest, most relevant liberal pundit on the planet. And each fades off into oblivion like the last when inundated with facts and reason. You werenâ€™t the first, you wonâ€™t be the last.&lt;/i&gt;

I sure hope he's the last.  His drivel gets older than Robert Byrd's white sheets.

&lt;i&gt;Apparently math wasnâ€™t your forte, either.&lt;/i&gt;

Not much is, I suspect.

&lt;i&gt;No wonder I never get the correct change back in the drive-thru. &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!&lt;/b&gt;  Damn, jerkagain, you got pwn3d big time on that one!  Get some aloe for that hiney, son, because you just got spanked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Liberals like you have come and gone many times over during that time. Each thinks heâ€™s the brightest, most relevant liberal pundit on the planet. And each fades off into oblivion like the last when inundated with facts and reason. You werenâ€™t the first, you wonâ€™t be the last.</i></p>
<p>I sure hope he&#8217;s the last.  His drivel gets older than Robert Byrd&#8217;s white sheets.</p>
<p><i>Apparently math wasnâ€™t your forte, either.</i></p>
<p>Not much is, I suspect.</p>
<p><i>No wonder I never get the correct change back in the drive-thru. </i></p>
<p><b>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!</b>  Damn, jerkagain, you got pwn3d big time on that one!  Get some aloe for that hiney, son, because you just got spanked!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Texas Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-112859</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-112859</guid>
					<description>Danny,
I've been doing this for more than 4 years now.  Liberals like you have come and gone many times over during that time.  Each thinks he's the brightest, most relevant liberal pundit on the planet.  And each fades off into oblivion like the last when inundated with facts and reason.  You weren't the first, you won't be the last.

"&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Your websiteâ€™s recent slide into oblivion ... perfectly representative of why everyone has left.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;"

You think a 30% increase in daily hits and an increase of 230% in feed subscribers is evidence of a "slide into oblivion"?  Apparently math wasn't your forte, either.  No wonder I never get the correct change back in the drive-thru.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny,<br />
I&#8217;ve been doing this for more than 4 years now.  Liberals like you have come and gone many times over during that time.  Each thinks he&#8217;s the brightest, most relevant liberal pundit on the planet.  And each fades off into oblivion like the last when inundated with facts and reason.  You weren&#8217;t the first, you won&#8217;t be the last.</p>
<p>&#8220;<b><i>Your websiteâ€™s recent slide into oblivion &#8230; perfectly representative of why everyone has left.</i></b>&#8221;</p>
<p>You think a 30% increase in daily hits and an increase of 230% in feed subscribers is evidence of a &#8220;slide into oblivion&#8221;?  Apparently math wasn&#8217;t your forte, either.  No wonder I never get the correct change back in the drive-thru.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: djernigan</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-112804</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-112804</guid>
					<description>Hi Tex,

Your websiteâ€™s recent slide into oblivion has been a source of endless entertainment for me.  For while you used to have a number of dissenters - to keep the debate in your comments pages lively and interesting - I see that they have basically all left you, so that now all that remains is the choir.

This post is a good example of the ill-informed and hysteric level of dialogue you have recently engaged in - and perfectly representative of why everyone has left.  

In fact - you state a simple untruth.  Al Sharpton has not asked that the Jena 6 go unpunished - but simply argued that the punishment does not fit the crime â€“ and that it is particularly unjust given that it is out of proportion to how whites are charged for similar offences.

Now â€“ I donâ€™t mean to suggest here that Al Sharptonâ€™s point isnâ€™t debatable â€“ but, rather, to simply suggest that when you misrepresent his position, you inhibit the very debate that you pretend to be engaged in raising for analysis.

Also notable is your reaction to Ahmadinejadâ€™s visit to Columbia University.  At first â€“ you are all prepared to take him and other perceived liberals to task for inviting him; then, when he has the nerve to defy expectation, without so much as an admission of your mistake, you begin to spin, spin, spin in another direction.  I mean really?  So liberals are to be faulted for not throwing pies at him â€“ as they did with Ann Coulter?  First of all â€“ do you have any idea what kind of security detail Ahmadinejad had in the U.S.?  

And second â€“ a few kids caught up in an anti-free speech prank is so poorly representative of democratic ideals that your parallel appears very nearly random.  

So â€“ anyway â€“ I hope you are still enjoying yourself with this blog.  I particularly enjoy the fact that my help is no longer needed, as you have very nearly slipped into self-parody â€“ what with your rabidly uncritical defense of an increasingly unpopular president â€“ engaged in an increasingly unpopular war, and this even while numerous other of your GOP cohorts (notably, George Will â€“ but numerous others as well) have gone on record to condemn Bushâ€™s forayâ€™s into the middle east as incompetent at best and criminal at worst.  You have suddenly become so. . . old fashioned. . . or is it . . . out of date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tex,</p>
<p>Your websiteâ€™s recent slide into oblivion has been a source of endless entertainment for me.  For while you used to have a number of dissenters - to keep the debate in your comments pages lively and interesting - I see that they have basically all left you, so that now all that remains is the choir.</p>
<p>This post is a good example of the ill-informed and hysteric level of dialogue you have recently engaged in - and perfectly representative of why everyone has left.  </p>
<p>In fact - you state a simple untruth.  Al Sharpton has not asked that the Jena 6 go unpunished - but simply argued that the punishment does not fit the crime â€“ and that it is particularly unjust given that it is out of proportion to how whites are charged for similar offences.</p>
<p>Now â€“ I donâ€™t mean to suggest here that Al Sharptonâ€™s point isnâ€™t debatable â€“ but, rather, to simply suggest that when you misrepresent his position, you inhibit the very debate that you pretend to be engaged in raising for analysis.</p>
<p>Also notable is your reaction to Ahmadinejadâ€™s visit to Columbia University.  At first â€“ you are all prepared to take him and other perceived liberals to task for inviting him; then, when he has the nerve to defy expectation, without so much as an admission of your mistake, you begin to spin, spin, spin in another direction.  I mean really?  So liberals are to be faulted for not throwing pies at him â€“ as they did with Ann Coulter?  First of all â€“ do you have any idea what kind of security detail Ahmadinejad had in the U.S.?  </p>
<p>And second â€“ a few kids caught up in an anti-free speech prank is so poorly representative of democratic ideals that your parallel appears very nearly random.  </p>
<p>So â€“ anyway â€“ I hope you are still enjoying yourself with this blog.  I particularly enjoy the fact that my help is no longer needed, as you have very nearly slipped into self-parody â€“ what with your rabidly uncritical defense of an increasingly unpopular president â€“ engaged in an increasingly unpopular war, and this even while numerous other of your GOP cohorts (notably, George Will â€“ but numerous others as well) have gone on record to condemn Bushâ€™s forayâ€™s into the middle east as incompetent at best and criminal at worst.  You have suddenly become so. . . old fashioned. . . or is it . . . out of date.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Thunder Run</title>
		<link>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-112788</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/09/25/the-truth-about-the-jena-6/#comment-112788</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Reconnaissance for 09/26/2007&lt;/strong&gt;

A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Reconnaissance for 09/26/2007</strong></p>
<p>A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day&#8230;so check back often.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
