His words, not mine. Check out his interview with Mark Mathews of ABC7 in San Francisco. At issue is a lawsuit filed by a union that supports Hillary to challenge the caucus process setup and agreed to by the state’s Democrat Party last year. The lawsuit comes “coincidentally” just 2 days after another large union endorsed Obama - despite having known about this issue since last year.

*Updated with embedded video*

Here’s Clinton’s response to the very first question:

Clinton: There were teachers who filed the lawsuit. You asked the question in an accusatory way, so I’ll ask you back. Do you really believe that all the Democrats understood that they had agreed to give everybody that voted at the casino a vote worth five times as much as people who voted in their own precinct? Did you know that? Their votes will be counted five times more powerfully in terms of delegates to the state convention that pick the delegates to the national convention. What happened is nobody understood what had happened. They uncovered it. And now everybody is saying, “Oh, they don’t want us to vote.” What they really tried to do was set up a deal where their votes counted five times, maybe even more, as much. So now they’re dealing with it.

Notice how Clinton admits that Democrat voters are stupid (in agreeing to something despite not knowing to what they were agreeing) while accusing the Nevada Democrat party of trying to subvert the caucus process.

Quite the admission.

The only thing missing was the finger wag.

UPDATE: Obama 1, Clinton 0.