Even the woman who sat in the defendant’s chair, having undisputedly murdered each one of her children with her own bare hands, reacted as if to say, “Holy crap, they bought that insanity gig?!?”
Talk about your all-time cases of injustice. This case ought to shine a gigantic spotlight on the travesty of justice that is the “insanity plea”.
Yates’ attorneys never disputed that she drowned 6-month-old Mary, 2-year-old Luke, 3-year-old Paul, 5-year-old John and 7-year-old Noah in their Houston-area home in June 2001. But they said she suffered from severe postpartum psychosis and, in a delusional state, believed Satan was inside her and was trying to save them from hell.
Get that? NEVER DISPUTED… It was never even an issue as to whether she knowingly filled her bathtub full of water before systematically chasing each child around the house, dragging them into the bathroom (some fighting for their lives) and holding their innocent little heads under the water under the precious life left their tiny bodies. NEVER FRIGGIN’ DISPUTED
But yet we held not one, but two trials in her honor. Andrea Yates committed what could be deemed as arguably the most heinous crime imaginable, killing her own child… and she systematically committed it FIVE TIMES… and the message from yesterday’s verdict is that murderers shouldn’t worry about serving jail time so long as they can convince a jury they had a really bad day.
And now Andrea Yates is finding the American justice system offering her the mercy she denied her own flesh and blood… and someday in the future, she may walk free to do it all over again.
The 42-year-old will be committed to a state mental hospital, with periodic hearings before a judge to determine whether she should be released. If convicted of murder, she would have faced life in prison.
Life in prison ought to be the minimum she faces. But no, thanks to the insanity defense, she may soon be able to walk right back out into public and procreate again. It’s not so much the insanity defense that’s the problem, as much as it is the liberal application of it in many cases. It seems to be the fallacy of circular argument whereby the argument goes like this: Only someone out of their mind could think about killing their own children, thus since she killed her own children, she must’ve been out of her mind. Therefore, Andrea Yates’ crime was so outrageous that it inherently came with a built-in defense to escape punishment.
And while I feel terrible for the psycho’s husband, Rusty, I was disappointed to read his reaction to the verdict, saying it was the right decision, and then lashing out at the prosecutors who sought justice for his murdered children.
Rusty Yates lashed out Thursday at prosecutors who spent five years pursuing murder charges against his ex-wife, saying they misrepresented certain details of the day Andrea Yates drowned their five children.
Who cares? For the sake of argument, let’s toss out every single “misrepresentation” made by prosecutors, and focus on a single, completely undisputed fact: Andrea Yates drowned her five children. Period.