Texas Rainmaker
All Aboard the RINO Express
December 17th, 2007 9:43 am

Here’s what I predicted on November 8, 2006:

In 2008, John McCain and Joe Lieberman will join forces and make a run for the Whitehouse.

Some called me crazy when I posted it.

But it’s not looking so crazy anymore:

Former Dem Lieberman endorses McCain

HILLSBOROUGH, N.H. - Sen. John McCain, trying to keep momentum in this state’s critical Republican primary race, brought in something unusual on Monday — an endorsement from the other party’s former vice presidential nominee.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Democrat Al Gore’s running mate in 2000, said he had intended to wait until after the primaries to make a choice for the 2008 presidential race. But McCain asked for his support and no Democrat did.

Lieberman, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, said he chose his longtime Senate colleague because he has the best shot of breaking partisan gridlock in Washington. Both men also support the war in Iraq.

I wish picking lottery numbers was as easy.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (1) Comment
divider
Wouldn’t It Be Ironic
November 8th, 2006 10:37 pm

Now that it looks like the Virginia Senate race is over and the Democrats have taken control of the Senate as well as the House, wouldn’t it be ironic, if the man Democrats threw to the wolves, Joe Lieberman, decided the best payback to his disloyal colleagues was to pull a Jeffords?

If Lieberman were to caucus with Republicans instead of Democrats, it would throw the balance of power back into a tie… which would be broken by the party of the Vice President… Republicans.

Considering it was Jefford’s jump just a few months into Bush’s presidency that stripped Republicans of the majority they’d won, it would only be fitting to see Democrats get a taste of their own medicine on the backend of the presidency.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (5) Comments
divider
Early 2008 Prediction
November 8th, 2006 4:59 pm

With 2006 all but in the record books, I’m going to take a leap and make a prediction for 2008. Back in June, I discussed the possibility that America is ready for a viable third party. I linked to a Peggy Noonan article that said the problem “is not that the two parties are polarized. In many ways they’re closer than ever.” I think we saw the evidence last night. Conservatives came out and rejected a Republican majority that resembled a Democrat Majority.

For six years, we’ve been waiting for Republican leadership to act like the majority we’d elected. For six year we anticipated the limiting role federal government was supposed to play. For six years, we were confident in the conservative movement. But for six years, all we got was more of the same over-spending, inefficient, out-of-touch beauracracy that we’ve come to expect from the Beltway. Liberals wanted a change. But so did Conservatives. And Libertarians and Independents were left without any real choices. And last night’s vote was as much a protest against a do-nothing majority as it was a protest against an opposing political party.

Some agree:

GLUM Republicans might turn their attention to the Libertarian Party to vent their anger. Libertarians are a generally Republican-leaning constituency, but over the last few years, their discontent has grown plain. It isn’t just the war, which some libertarians supported, but the corruption and insider dealing, and particularly the massive expansion of spending.

Ed Driscoll says it’s a race to the center:

If you go by the bills that won, and the candidates that won, that sounds correct–several individual conservative Republican candidates didn’t win–but most far left anti-war types like Ned Lamont didn’t clean-up, either. As Jonah mentioned in his recent TCS podcast with me, Democrats win when they move towards the center (just ask Bill Clinton), and right now, the center is where the action is. That doesn’t sound like an environment that will be smooth sailing for a quintessential San Francisco Democrat like Speaker Pelosi over the next two years, but we’ll see.

And in this election, we saw two things occur in the center: Joe Lieberman won as an Independent and John McCain gained political capital. I’ve been saying for years that you could probably switch the party affiliations of both men and nobody would really notice. They’re both as close to the other’s party as one can get without officially registering - at least as compared to the other members of their own party. Neither seems beholden to the party line. And maybe that’s what voters are seeking.

So my prediction comes down to this:

In 2008, John McCain and Joe Lieberman will join forces and make a run for the Whitehouse.

There, I’ve said it. Now bookmark this page and come back in a year and tell me I’m crazy.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (2) Comments
divider
The Definition of Sweet Justice
November 1st, 2006 3:44 pm

Oh how sweet it would be

Sen. Joe Lieberman alienated plenty of Democrats with his independent bid. Just imagine their anger if he costs them control of the House.

Oh, I can imagine it. I want to imagine it.

The three-term Connecticut senator is aggressively pursuing Republican and independent voters in his race against Democratic nominee Ned Lamont and little-known Republican Alan Schlesinger. That targeted appeal — and the potential for a strong GOP turnout — could save three GOP House incumbents struggling to return to Washington.

Lieberman’s coattails could carry the GOP incumbents to re-election and undercut Democratic hopes of majority control of the House.

I would pay anything to see the look on the faces of Daily “Screw Them” Kos and his minions, who fought so hard against Lieberman, if this happens.

OTHERS:
Allah calls it “So sweet. So achingly sweet…”.

The apparent end of the much-ballyhooed Lamont phenomenon is causing a great deal of soul-searching and recrimination in all corners of the Democratic Party. The bloggers that once championed Mr. Lamont as an awkward but earnest savior now alternately blame Washington’s strategists for hijacking their candidate and Democratic leaders for abandoning him. Beltway consultants fault the Lamont campaign for failing to move the candidate beyond his left-wing celebrity and define him for a greater electorate.

Posted by TexasRainmaker | (1) Comment
divider

Texas Rainmaker is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
Graphics by: Margolis Media Works | Style by: Lisa Sabin - E.Webscapes

Copyright © 2003-2006






The 2007 Weblog Awards